How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Biomolecules, Book of Genesis, Catalysis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Chemistry, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Enzyme, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Metabolism, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Survival of the fittest, World view
Question #1. How did life — with specifications for hundreds of proteins — originate just by random interactions of chemicals without intelligent design?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Paul Davies, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
How did life — with hundreds of proteins and strictly by chemistry without any intelligent design or intelligent agent — originate? While this is a question that Darwinists cannot answer, it is a question for which believers in the Biblical account of creation can very easily answer.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
In Sunday school a few weeks ago, we were studying Romans 1, and through a rabbit chasing a rabbit course of conversation, I mentioned that we do not watch popular culture television. We don’t have cable, we don’t do whatever HD thing you need to do to get base television stations, and we have no intention of changing that in the near future. I said that the reason why is because we are so strict about what we allow into our home in the form of entertainment, that there are actually very few shows that we would even be able to watch if we were willing to free up that much time in our lives for watching.
Pin It
Tags: Culture, Nancy Leigh DeMoss, Philosophy, Religion, The Lies Women Believe and the Truth that Sets That Sets Them Free
The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
The fallacy of the question-begging epithet is committed when an arguer tries to evoke an emotional response that is meant to persuade others of a point that is logically questionable.
Pin It
Tags: Abstraction, Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Begging the question, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
In this post, I will discuss the Fallacy of Begging the Question. Begging the Question introduces irrelevancy into the argument because it does not introduce any new information. Begging the Question merely reasserts the existing position (suppositions/assumptions) of the debater.
Pin It
Tags: Abstraction, Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Begging the question, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
In this post, I will discuss the Fallacy of the Complex Question. The Fallacy of the Complex Question uses biased language in place of reasoned, rational, logical argumentation.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Begging the question, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
In this post, I will discuss the Fallacy of Equivocation.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Equivocation, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Fallacy of Equivocation, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Reification, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
