Abiogenesis is the notion that if you assemble all of the base components you need in order for life to exist under the ideal conditions, that life will simply happen. The context of this so called theory is that all of the base components needed in order for life to exist, along with all of the ideal conditions, had to have come together randomly and exclusively by way of undirected processes.
The next series of Sunday posts will focus on the Darwinian concept of “Abiogenesis” which is the authoritatively scientific sounding word that Darwinists invented to describe how life sprung into existence from non-living matter.
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould
Today, I will conclude the series on the age of planet earth documenting evidence from living things and demonstrating some mathematical evidences.
Tags: A.E.J. Engel, Age of the Earth, Archaeology, B.C., Biology, Botany, Bristlecone pine, British Columbia, California Institute of Technology, Carl Sagan, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Cupressaceae, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dendrochronology, Emilé Borel, Environment, Evolution, Forestry, Geochronology, Methodological Naturalism, Methuselah, Natural history of California, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Sequoia, Sierra Nevada Mountains, Tree, William Demski
Today, I will document logical evidence for a young earth based on a series of logical questions. The premise of these questions is going to be based on facts, not assumptions. I realize that if you are a Darwinist then logic is meaningless to you and facts are irrelevant. Therefore, this post is written more for those who are capable of logical thought and accepting facts, and for that I apologize.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Archaeology, Australia, Botany, Bristlecone pine, Charles Darwin, China, Creation myth, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Damascus, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dendrochronology, Environment, Evolution, Flat Earth, Forestry, Geochronology, Great Barrier Reef, Methodological Naturalism, Methuselah, Nature, Oldest City, Pseudoscience, Religion/Belief, Sahara desert, Secular Humanism, Tree
Posted by Gregg on Feb 7, 2010 in
Creation,
apologetics,
homeschooling I realized that while all of this information is far from new to me, now, after the years of research I have performed on this subject, it may be completely and entirely new to some readers due to the fact that no one dares teach it and thus defy the Darwinian stranglehold on academia.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, Coastal geography, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Earth, Environment, Environmental soil science, Euphrates river, Evolution, Geology, Great Barrier Reef, Gulf of Mexico, Methodological Naturalism, Michael Denton, Mississippi, Mississippi embayment, Mississippi River, Mississippi River Delta, Niagara Falls, Niagara Falls gorge, Ocean, Oceanic basin, Persian Gulf, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Sediment, Sedimentology, Soil, Tigris river
Posted by Gregg on Jan 31, 2010 in
Creation,
apologetics,
homeschooling There are numerous facts that tend to point to the conclusion that our world is quite young. This post will focus on some of the evidences from beneath the surface.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Destroyed oil reservoirs, Environment, Evolution, Fuels, Galaxy, Helium, James Perloff, Max Blumer, Methodological Naturalism, Natural gas, Oceanic oil pollution, Oil, Oil and gas, Oil bed, Oil deposits, Oil gusher, Oil platforms, Oil reserves, Oil reservoirs, Oil seepage, Oil well, Petroleum, Petroleum production, Petroleum reservoir, Physical law, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, The Universe, Zircon
Posted by Gregg on Jan 24, 2010 in
Creation,
apologetics,
homeschooling Vast amounts of time don’t prove Darwinism, but if the earth is quite young, that directly refutes Darwinism. This post continues to present facts about the age of the earth looking at evidence from our atmosphere and from our globe itself.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Atmosphere, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Decay law, Earth, Environment, Evolution, Helium, K.F. Gauss, Kelvin, Larry Vardiman, Melvin A. Cook, Methodological Naturalism, Physicist, Planetary atmospheres, Planetary science, Plasma physics, Polytechnic Institute, Religion/Belief, Robert Whitelaw, Secular Humanism, Space plasmas, Terrestrial planets
I documented evidence from comets, meteors and meteorites, our fellow planets in our solar system, and our sun. All of the empirical evidence suggests that the earth cannot be billions or even millions of years old. There are an astonishing number of factual evidences that our world is quite young.
Tags: A. Lyttleton, Age of the Earth, Apollo Missions, Apollo program, Architect, Charles Darwin, Christ Jesus, Comets, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Edwin Aldrin, Environment, Evolution, Exploration of the Moon, Geodesy, Jonathan Sarfati, LEM, Lunar isotopes, Lunar Landing, Lunar science, Lunar soil, Meteorites, Meteors, Methodological Naturalism, Moon, Moon dust, Moon rocks, Moons, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Neil Armstrong, Northrup Grumman, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Tidal acceleration
As I said last Sunday, vast amounts of time don’t prove Darwinism. However, short amounts of time, young ages, directly refute Darwinism. Today, I will continue to present some facts about the age of the earth and the universe in which we exist. While opinions can vary pretty vastly, the fact is that there are numerous factual evidences that our world is quite young.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Astronomer, Astronomy, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Creation–evolution controversy, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Evolution, Hydrogen, Methodological Naturalism, Planetary science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Solar energy, Solar energy theory, Solar System, Stellar energy, Sun, The Universe
Vast amounts of time don’t prove Darwinism. However, the converse does not follow. Short amounts of time, young ages, directly refute Darwinism. This is why Darwinists have worked so hard over the last half century to make anyone who believes earth and the universe to be, in fact, rather young look like a quack, a nut, or someone with an agenda.
Tags: Age of the Earth, Astronomer, Astronomy, Binary Stars, Charles Darwin, Comet, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Creation–evolution controversy, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Evolution, High-Energy Stars, Hydrogen, Jan Hendrik Oort, Jan Oort, Methodological Naturalism, Oort cloud, Planetary science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Solar energy, Solar energy theory, Solar System, Star Clusters, Stellar energy, Sun, The Universe
