The logical claim is that less evolved “lower” life forms become more evolved “higher” life forms by means of the mechanisms of Neo-Darwinism — namely: mutation and natural selection.Pin It
In the final analysis, mutations don’t help Darwinian theory at all. There are three major limiting factors that preclude scientific extrapolation from mutational change to evolutionary change on a Darwinian scale.Pin It
One thing about my personality that most people can pick up on within a short amount of time in meeting me is that I’m a very capable person. If I see a task, I figure out a way to accomplish it. I’m good at logic, I’m good at critical thinking, I’m good at math, and I have a tendency to take charge and lead. All of those things combine into one neat little capable package.
Just as in the days before Darwin, thousands of scientists in recent times, and hundreds of thousands of laymen, have concluded that the Biblical framework is the more logical inference based on scientific evidence and observations.Pin It
That, in a nutshell, is a summary of the motivation behind what forms proposed agenda for the first part of the new year. I state this here in black and white just in case anyone had any remaining doubts about my motivation or my personal agenda.Pin It
FACT 1: Countless very specific and accurate scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 2: Countless very specific and accurate points of logic do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 3: Many Darwinian interpretations do not agree with many other Darwinian interpretations and are often contradictory or in conflict.
FACT 4: Darwinists resort to threats, ridicule, legal maneuverings, fraud, and excommunication to counter arguments against Darwinism.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists practice censorship to avoid debate that would reveal their theories to be scientifically baseless and logically fallacious.
FACT 1: Accurate renditions of actual finds and scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 2: Misleading renditions in museums and school textbooks amount to indoctrination, not valid information.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.
FACT 1: There is NOTHING in observed science that disputes the Biblical account of creation.
FACT 2: There is NOTHING in observed science that supports Darwinism or Darwinian theories.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists ignore scientific evidence that refute their theories.