Posted by Hallee on Aug 3, 2010 in
Blog Stuff
In other words, it may pay in health benefits to buy Organic peaches, but you get almost no benefit from paying extra for Organic bananas. And, seriously, what kind of “health” benefit are you reaping by eating cotton candy, whether it’s made from Organic processed sugar or non-Organic processed sugar?
Tags: agribusiness conglomerate, Agriculture, Amy Tuteur, energy, energy drinks, Environmental Working Group, Food, food addictions, Food and drink, fruits, motor oil, National Organic Program, non-organic food, Organic farming, Organic food, Organic movement, Organic product, organic products, Organic Trade Association, Pesticide, Sustainability, Technology/Internet, United States Department of Agriculture, USD, vegetables
Posted by Gregg on Apr 18, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling
If it is as simple as just having the right conditions, it is reasonable to think that life should have “evolved” according to Darwinian principles many, many times before the advent of photosynthesis produced an oxygen concentration which made conditions unfavorable. Yet all life rides upon the same bio-molecules, metabolic pathways, and genetic information which refutes this notion.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biochemistry, Biology, Cambridge University, Charles Darwin, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, energy, Every Sunday, Gene expression, Genetics, Louis Pasteur, Metabolism, Methodological Naturalism, Mitochondrion, Nucleic acid, Oparin, Protein, Protein biosynthesis, Proteins, RNA, Secular Humanism, Soviet scientist, Stanley Miller
Posted by Hallee on Mar 23, 2010 in
Housekeeping,
Life
Spring cleaning made a lot of sense for centuries. When homes were heated with wood or coal, the winter heating season brought a build-up of soot and ash on walls, furniture, and fabrics. Spring cleaning marked the end of the heating season, when the entire house was aired and scrubbed clean, when windows could be opened and the winds of spring would blow through the house, refreshing it.
Tags: Cleaning, energy, Facebook Inc, Home, Home economics, Housekeeping, Microeconomics, Personal life, Soot, Spring, Spring cleaning, Twitter Inc
Posted by Gregg on Mar 14, 2010 in
Blog Stuff
I explained the Darwinist belief in spontaneous generation packaged for textbooks as abiogenesis, and recently re-packaged and re-branded and re-labeled to be called biopoiesis, until a new and improved authoritatively scientific sounding word replaces that one. It means, in a nutshell, that Darwinists preach about life coming from non-life.
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Biology, Charles Darwin, chemical reaction, chemical reactions, chemical transformations, Chemistry, Condensation, electricity, energy, Every Sunday, Evolutionary biology, Frankenstein, Mary Shelly, Miller–Urey experiment, Molecular biology, Nature, Nutrition, Origin of life, Protein, separate chemicals
Vast amounts of time don’t prove Darwinism. However, the converse does not follow. Short amounts of time, young ages, directly refute Darwinism. This is why Darwinists have worked so hard over the last half century to make anyone who believes earth and the universe to be, in fact, rather young look like a quack, a nut, or someone with an agenda.
Pin It
Tags: Age of the Earth, Astronomer, Astronomy, Binary Stars, Charles Darwin, Comet, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Evolution, High-Energy Stars, Hydrogen, Jan Hendrik Oort, Jan Oort, Methodological Naturalism, Oort cloud, Planetary science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Solar energy, Solar energy theory, Solar System, Star Clusters, Stellar energy, Sun, The Universe
Steller evolution is the theory of the origin of stars, or how stars are born. The theories of stellar evolution can be largely separated into two categories. There are theories that fall into how stars “evolved” as part of the aftermath of the Cosmic Evolution brought about by the Big Bang, and there are other theories about how stars are “evolving” even today.
Pin It
Tags: Age of the Earth, Astrophysics, Charles Darwin, Chemical elements, Christian, Christian Faith, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Evolution, Gas cloud, Gas clouds, Helium, Homeschool, Methodological Naturalism, Nuclear physics, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Space plasmas, Star, Stellar astronomy, Stellar evolution
Matter, like air, can get hot. An absense of matter cannot get hot. Heat is energy. Energy is simply transformed matter. This is why we have the first law of thermodynamics. But nothingness is an absence of matter and and absence of energy. In point of fact, nothing is an absense of everything. Nothing can become neither dense nor hot. Things like air get hot, because air is matter, not an absence of it, and some of the matter in air can be transformed into energy which nothing cannot do since it is nothing.
Pin It
Tags: Age of the Earth, Albert Einstein, Big Bang, Charles Darwin, Chemical explosion, Christian, Christian Faith, Cosmologists, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Evolution, Gas clouds, George Gamow, George Reeves, Homeschool, Man-Made Disaster, Matter, Methodological Naturalism, Nothing, Obsolete scientific theories, Particle physics, Physical cosmology, Physical law, Proto-Stars, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Steven W. Hawking, Superman, Thermodynamics, Universe