Tag: Pseudoscience
Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs).
Living things look like they were designed, so how do Darwinists know that they were not designed?
Pin It
How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Pin It
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
Pin It
How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
Pin It
If a non-material apparatus was absolutely required to hold the theory together, such an apparatus would lay the entire Darwinist religion to waste. Guess what?
Pin It