How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Biomolecules, Book of Genesis, Catalysis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Chemistry, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Enzyme, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Metabolism, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Survival of the fittest, World view
How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Amino acid, Biology, Christian theology, Chromosome, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Cytogenetics, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, DNA, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Gene, Genetics, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, hemophilia, human diseases, Indoctrination, Jerry Coyne, Logic, Materialism, Methodological materialism, Methodological Naturalism, microbiologist, Mitochondrial Eve, Mitochondrial genetics, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Ploidy, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Somatic cell, World view
Question #1. How did life — with specifications for hundreds of proteins — originate just by random interactions of chemicals without intelligent design?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Paul Davies, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
How did life — with hundreds of proteins and strictly by chemistry without any intelligent design or intelligent agent — originate? While this is a question that Darwinists cannot answer, it is a question for which believers in the Biblical account of creation can very easily answer.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
Darwinists must somehow explain the introduction of completely new genetic instructions (information) for feathers, life preserving secretions, highly specific and specifically complex symbiotic relationships, instinctual migration patterns, and other wonders that never existed in more ‘simple’ forms of life.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Developmental biology, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Fallacy, Gary Parker, Gene duplication, genetic engineering, Genetics, Homeobox, Hox gene, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, John Rennie, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Scientific American, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
With hundreds of millions of years for constant mutations to build up and natural selection to occur, even the most ardent Darwinists should reasonably expect tremendous differences in the organism’s appearance by now.
Pin It
Tags: Book of Genesis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lazarus Taxa, Life from non-life, Living Fossils, Methodological Naturalism, Mitochondrial Eve, Mutation, Natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Religion, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Must evolutionary science, from time to time, simply fake evidence, commit fraud, perpetrate hoaxes — lie? Why is that? Why stage so-called evidence when none exists? Why fill in the blanks of all of the unknowns with pure speculation? Why lie? Why perpetrate fraud? Why commit hoaxes?
Pin It
Tags: Bernard Kettlewell, Biology, British Peppered Moth, Carl Wieland, Charles Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Environment, Fake, Fraud, Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell, Jerry A. Coyne, Kettlewell's experiment, L. Harrison Matthews, Lepidopterists, Methodological Naturalism, Moth, Natural selection, Nature, Peppered moth, Peppered moth evolution, Science, Secular Humanism, Selection, Social Darwinism, Staged Photographs, Theodore Sargent
Vestigial structures are probably the best example of Darwinian reliance upon circular reasoning to “prove” their alleged point, that point being that Darwinian evolution is “true.” Vestigial organs are also a very good example of intentional and continuing fraud perpetrated by Darwinists.
Pin It
Tags: Anatomy, Biology, Charles Darwin, Coccyx, Darwinism, Every Sunday, Evolution, Horatio Newman, Human anatomy, Human vestigiality, Methodological Naturalism, Natural selection, Robert Ernst Wiedersheim, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Vestigial Organs, Vestigial Structures, Vestigiality
