How did life — with hundreds of proteins and strictly by chemistry without any intelligent design or intelligent agent — originate? While this is a question that Darwinists cannot answer, it is a question for which believers in the Biblical account of creation can very easily answer.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
Darwinists must somehow explain the introduction of completely new genetic instructions (information) for feathers, life preserving secretions, highly specific and specifically complex symbiotic relationships, instinctual migration patterns, and other wonders that never existed in more ‘simple’ forms of life.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Developmental biology, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Fallacy, Gary Parker, Gene duplication, genetic engineering, Genetics, Homeobox, Hox gene, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, John Rennie, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Scientific American, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
With hundreds of millions of years for constant mutations to build up and natural selection to occur, even the most ardent Darwinists should reasonably expect tremendous differences in the organism’s appearance by now.
Pin It
Tags: Book of Genesis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lazarus Taxa, Life from non-life, Living Fossils, Methodological Naturalism, Mitochondrial Eve, Mutation, Natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Religion, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Must evolutionary science, from time to time, simply fake evidence, commit fraud, perpetrate hoaxes — lie? Why is that? Why stage so-called evidence when none exists? Why fill in the blanks of all of the unknowns with pure speculation? Why lie? Why perpetrate fraud? Why commit hoaxes?
Pin It
Tags: Bernard Kettlewell, Biology, British Peppered Moth, Carl Wieland, Charles Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Environment, Fake, Fraud, Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell, Jerry A. Coyne, Kettlewell's experiment, L. Harrison Matthews, Lepidopterists, Methodological Naturalism, Moth, Natural selection, Nature, Peppered moth, Peppered moth evolution, Science, Secular Humanism, Selection, Social Darwinism, Staged Photographs, Theodore Sargent
Vestigial structures are probably the best example of Darwinian reliance upon circular reasoning to “prove” their alleged point, that point being that Darwinian evolution is “true.” Vestigial organs are also a very good example of intentional and continuing fraud perpetrated by Darwinists.
Pin It
Tags: Anatomy, Biology, Charles Darwin, Coccyx, Darwinism, Every Sunday, Evolution, Horatio Newman, Human anatomy, Human vestigiality, Methodological Naturalism, Natural selection, Robert Ernst Wiedersheim, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Vestigial Organs, Vestigial Structures, Vestigiality
Before I wade into the morass of macro-evolution, I felt it was important to reflect upon the basic formal argument for Darwinism as a religious belief.
Pin It
Tags: Biology, Darwinism, Darwinists, Every Sunday, Evolution, hybridization, intelligent agent, Methodological Naturalism, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Randomness, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Survival of the fittest
In plain English, micro-evolution is what happens when, say for example, corn pollinates and makes slightly different corn in the next generation of … corn. Or when dogs interbreed and make a different breed of dog. Or when human beings have human babies. In other words, it isn’t even evolution. It is simply modification within kind, also called change within kind, also called variation within kind.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Chemical Evolution, Christian, Christian Faith, Cosmic evolution, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinists, Edgar Allan Poe, Evolution, Gregor Mendel, Homeschool, Louis Pastuer, Macro-evolution, Man-Made Disaster, Methodological Naturalism, Micro-evolution, Natural selection, New York City Library, Objections to evolution, Secular Humanism, Species, Stellar evolution
Darwinists scrambled for “engines” that would “drive” Darwinian evolution. This is admittedly an attempt to skew the odds to make their idiotic theory somewhat plausible by compensating for finite time and matter in the universe.
Even supposing the universe is 15 billion years old, that is a finite amount of seconds in which an infinite amount of changes must occur for Darwinism to be true. Even supposing the earth is 4 billion or so years old, a single cell has to assemble itself from dirt and rocks and such by an undirected, unguided, random process –and for that simple single cell to appear, a nearly infinite number of random occurrences must take place in order, without error. The best estimates put it at a greater than 1 in 10 to the 100,000,000,000th power chance.
Pin It
Tags: Charles Darwin, chemicals, Christian, Christian Faith, Creation, Creationism, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinists, Evolution, Homeschool, Infinite monkey theorem, Lamarckism, Malaria, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Natural selection, Objections to evolution, Online mutant dating service, Punctuated equilibrium, Richard Dawkins, Secular Humanism, Stephen Jay Gould, William Shakespeare
Lamarckism, the notion of “inheritance of acquired characteristics” while utterly disproven over a century ago, continues today as the unstated philosophical basis of all Darwinian evolutionary biology. While admittedly lacking in either proof or reason, Lamarckism nevertheless excuses Darwinists from contemplating the possibility that nature espouses implications outside of Methodological Naturalism.
Pin It
Tags: August Weismann, Christian, Christian Faith, Creation, Creationism, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Evolution, Friedrich Leopold Weismann, Giraffe, Homeschool, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Lamarckism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Natural selection
