How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Biomolecules, Book of Genesis, Catalysis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Chemistry, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Enzyme, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Metabolism, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Survival of the fittest, World view
Question #1. How did life — with specifications for hundreds of proteins — originate just by random interactions of chemicals without intelligent design?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Paul Davies, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Posted by Gregg on Apr 25, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling
Citing the thoughts of experts on the topic of abiogenesis.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Amino acid, Applied mathematics, Biochemistry, Biology, Chandra Wickramasinghe, Christian Science Monitor, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, David J. Rodabough, David Kitts, Ernst Mayr, Essential amino acid, Francis Crick, Fred Hoyle, Frederick Hoyle, Gordon R. Taylor, Harold C. Urey, Howard B. Holroyd, Howard Byington Holroyd, James Coppedge, Mathematics, Methodological Naturalism, Nature, Odds, Origin of life, Prebiological Systems, Probability, Probability theory, Protein, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Statistics, Stephen Hawking, Sydney W. Fox
Posted by Gregg on Apr 11, 2010 in
Christian Faith,
Creation,
homeschooling
One second after it dies, an animal still has all its chemicals, proteins, fatty acids, enzymes, codes, and all the rest. But it no longer has life. Scientists cannot produce life; why then should they expect rocks and seawater to have that ability?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Architect, Barlian University, Barlian University in Israel, Biochemistry, Biology, chemical compounds, chemicals, Chemistry, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Essential amino acid, Every Sunday, genetic engineering, inadequate chemicals, Methodological Naturalism, Nature, nearby chemicals, Nitrogen metabolism, Nutrition, Origin of life, Protein, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism
Posted by Gregg on Mar 28, 2010 in
Blog Stuff
While not being very scientific, panspermia is a great example of a “god of the gaps” fallacy and a great example of the religious foolishness Darwinists preach and teach in the name of the secular humanist religion. Perhaps textbooks should come with the following warning, “Abandon all logic ye who enter into Darwinism.”
Tags: Abiogenesis, Astrobiology, Bernal, Carl Sagan, chemical compounds, Chemical elements, chemicals, Chemistry, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Extraterrestrial life, Francis Hitching, gas-phase process, high-energy compounds, high-energy phosphate, Leslie E. Orgel, Matter, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Nature, Nonmetals, Origin of life, Panspermia, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, snake oil vendors, Social Darwinism, Stanley L. Miller, Stanley Miller, TREE OF LIFE, Water
Posted by Gregg on Mar 14, 2010 in
Blog Stuff
I explained the Darwinist belief in spontaneous generation packaged for textbooks as abiogenesis, and recently re-packaged and re-branded and re-labeled to be called biopoiesis, until a new and improved authoritatively scientific sounding word replaces that one. It means, in a nutshell, that Darwinists preach about life coming from non-life.
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Biology, Charles Darwin, chemical reaction, chemical reactions, chemical transformations, Chemistry, Condensation, electricity, energy, Every Sunday, Evolutionary biology, Frankenstein, Mary Shelly, Miller–Urey experiment, Molecular biology, Nature, Nutrition, Origin of life, Protein, separate chemicals
Abiogenesis is the notion that if you assemble all of the base components you need in order for life to exist under the ideal conditions, that life will simply happen. The context of this so called theory is that all of the base components needed in order for life to exist, along with all of the ideal conditions, had to have come together randomly and exclusively by way of undirected processes.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould
The next series of Sunday posts will focus on the Darwinian concept of “Abiogenesis” which is the authoritatively scientific sounding word that Darwinists invented to describe how life sprung into existence from non-living matter.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould