How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Biomolecules, Book of Genesis, Catalysis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Chemistry, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Enzyme, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Metabolism, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Why is natural selection taught as ‘evolution’ as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Survival of the fittest, World view
How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Amino acid, Biology, Christian theology, Chromosome, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Cytogenetics, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, DNA, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Gene, Genetics, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, hemophilia, human diseases, Indoctrination, Jerry Coyne, Logic, Materialism, Methodological materialism, Methodological Naturalism, microbiologist, Mitochondrial Eve, Mitochondrial genetics, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Ploidy, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Somatic cell, World view
If a non-material apparatus was absolutely required to hold the theory together, such an apparatus would lay the entire Darwinist religion to waste. Guess what?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Amino acid, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Information theory, Intelligent design, lifeless chemicals, Logic, Materialism, Mathematics, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Theistic evolution, Theory, Werner Gitt, World view
Question #1. How did life — with specifications for hundreds of proteins — originate just by random interactions of chemicals without intelligent design?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Andrew Knoll, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Harold Urey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Paul Davies, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
How did life — with hundreds of proteins and strictly by chemistry without any intelligent design or intelligent agent — originate? While this is a question that Darwinists cannot answer, it is a question for which believers in the Biblical account of creation can very easily answer.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
Darwinists must somehow explain the introduction of completely new genetic instructions (information) for feathers, life preserving secretions, highly specific and specifically complex symbiotic relationships, instinctual migration patterns, and other wonders that never existed in more ‘simple’ forms of life.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Developmental biology, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Fallacy, Gary Parker, Gene duplication, genetic engineering, Genetics, Homeobox, Hox gene, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, John Rennie, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Scientific American, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The truth is that we were all created in God’s image. We did not come about as a result of mathematically impossible chance and accident. Mutation is the current placeholder in the current secular humanist world view until a better naturalistic, materialistic explanation can be hypothesized. For now, it is the best they have, and it is extremely weak.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The logical claim is that less evolved “lower” life forms become more evolved “higher” life forms by means of the mechanisms of Neo-Darwinism — namely: mutation and natural selection.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
