The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
FACT 1: Countless very specific and accurate scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 2: Countless very specific and accurate points of logic do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 3: Many Darwinian interpretations do not agree with many other Darwinian interpretations and are often contradictory or in conflict.
FACT 4: Darwinists resort to threats, ridicule, legal maneuverings, fraud, and excommunication to counter arguments against Darwinism.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists practice censorship to avoid debate that would reveal their theories to be scientifically baseless and logically fallacious.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, Charles Darwin, Cognition, Creation, Creationism, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Donald C. Johanson, Donald Johanson, Epistemology, Human evolution, Icons of Evolution, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lucy, Methodological Naturalism, Owen Lovejoy, Paleoanthropology, Paleontology, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Relativism, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Transitional fossil, World view
FACT 1: Accurate renditions of actual finds and scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 2: Misleading renditions in museums and school textbooks amount to indoctrination, not valid information.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, Charles Darwin, Cognition, Creation, Creationism, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Donald C. Johanson, Donald Johanson, Epistemology, Human evolution, Icons of Evolution, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lucy, Methodological Naturalism, Owen Lovejoy, Paleoanthropology, Paleontology, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Relativism, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Transitional fossil, World view
FACT 1: There is NOTHING in observed science that disputes the Biblical account of creation.
FACT 2: There is NOTHING in observed science that supports Darwinism or Darwinian theories.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists ignore scientific evidence that refute their theories.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creationism, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Donald C. Johanson, Donald Johanson, Epistemology, Human evolution, Hypothesis testing, Indoctrination, Jeremy Cherfas, Lucy, Methodological Naturalism, Owen Lovejoy, Paleoanthropology, Paleontology, Philosophy, Relativism, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Transitional fossil, World view
Posted by Gregg on Sep 5, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling “Skull fragment may not be human”, announced the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The Daily Telegraph, an Australian newspaper, carried the story of the latest bone hoax with the much more humorous (pardon the pun) headline: “ASS TAKEN FOR MAN.”
Pin It
Tags: Alan Walker, anthropologist, Anthropology, Archaeology, Cenozoic, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Ernst Haeckel, Human Interest, Ian Anderson, José Gibert, Methodological Naturalism, New Scientist, Noel Boaz, Orce, Paleontology, Paul Palmqvist, Piltdown Man, Science, scientist, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Solly Zuckerman, Spain, The Daily Telegraph, the Knoxville News, University of California-Berkeley
A recent comment made it clear to me that I had not covered my reasons for calling Darwinism a religion in enough detail. I will recap those reasons here, for the record, and then continue the series of “Pious Frauds” committed by the Darwinian faithful.
Pin It
Tags: Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Evolution, Methodological Naturalism, Nature, Recapitulation theory, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, The Big Bang, Theism, Thermodynamics
If Darwinists were so obviously right, why all the Pious Fraud? Why ANY fraud at all? Why not let facts lead to unavoidable conclusions? Why add lies, misdirection, obfuscation, mendacity, fraud, and fabrication to the argument? Why is that necessary? What is the meaning of that? What do you suppose the intent, is?
Pin It
Tags: America, Archaeology, Caveman, Charles Darwin, Clarence Darrow, Creationism, Cro-Magnon, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dayton, Elliot Smith, Evolution, Extinction, Grafton Elliot Smith, Henry F. Osborn, Jack Cuozzo, Joachim Neander, Kabwe skull, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Neanderthal, Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Rudolph Virchow, Scopes Trial, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Tennessee, Thomas H. Huxley, William Jennings Bryan
Posted by Gregg on May 23, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling If you leave a Microsoft Exchange Server alone long enough it will naturally turn into an iPhone. All you need is the magic ingredient of millions of years and a really cool, yet utterly random program that will replicate itself.
Pin It
Tags: Academy of Information Science, Computing, Creation science, Creationism, Digital audio, Evolution, Information Technology, IPhone, Microsoft Corporation, Richard Dawkins, scientist, Stephen Hawking, Young Earth creationism
Posted by Gregg on May 2, 2010 in
apologetics,
Christian Faith I will try my very best to find time in the coming week to present more scientific evidence that supports the Biblical view of creation next Sunday. This Sunday, I will write a more personal post concerning some personal thoughts and observations that have been on my heart in recent days.
Tags: Creation, Creationism, Darwinism, Secular Humanism
Posted by Gregg on Mar 28, 2010 in
Blog Stuff While not being very scientific, panspermia is a great example of a “god of the gaps” fallacy and a great example of the religious foolishness Darwinists preach and teach in the name of the secular humanist religion. Perhaps textbooks should come with the following warning, “Abandon all logic ye who enter into Darwinism.”
Tags: Abiogenesis, Astrobiology, Bernal, Carl Sagan, chemical compounds, Chemical elements, chemicals, Chemistry, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Extraterrestrial life, Francis Hitching, gas-phase process, high-energy compounds, high-energy phosphate, Leslie E. Orgel, Matter, Methodological Naturalism, Miller–Urey experiment, Nature, Nonmetals, Origin of life, Panspermia, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, snake oil vendors, Social Darwinism, Stanley L. Miller, Stanley Miller, TREE OF LIFE, Water
