Creation: Darwinian Evolutionary Frauds Pt. XVI
A Sunday guest post by my brilliant husband, Gregg.
Every Sunday, my clever husband offers me a “day of rest” by writing posts on the subject of his primary ministry. This is a topic that is gaining more and more attention in our modern culture. The topic, Creationism vs. Darwinism, is a subject that has broad reaching scientific, social, and metaphysical implications. For believers and non-believers alike, the primary purpose is to present scientific, historical, logical, and/or sociological data in an empirical fashion, as much as possible written in layman’s terms, and in a format suitable for supplementing any homeschool curriculum whether you choose to believe the Biblical account — or secular guesses — about the origins of human life on earth.
For this case study, I will use the case of “Lucy” and if you need background on Lucy, please read the introductory post from last Sunday.
This is the second of three final posts which will conclude this series on Darwinian Evolutionary Frauds. In the final three weeks, I will focus on these three claims:
- Darwinists ignore scientific evidence that refutes their theories.
- Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.
- Darwinists practice censorship to avoid debate that would reveal their theories to be baseless and fallacious
FACT 1: Accurate renditions of actual finds and scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.
FACT 2: Misleading renditions in museums and school textbooks amount to indoctrination, not valid information.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.
Supporting Detail: Darwinian evolution is taught as fact, not theory, in nearly ever scholarly venue. Charts, diagrams, artist impressions, statues, and the like are all carefully “spun” to reflect Darwinist beliefs, not facts.
When facts are presented without spin, critical thinking will lead reasonable human beings to their own conclusions which often differ from Darwinian bias and more accurately reflect truth.
The fact is, there is no foundational truth to Darwinism. Nothing cannot make something. Gas cannot condense in a vacuum. Lighter elements cannot “evolve” in situ into heavier elements. The earth is not billions of years old. Dirt and rocks do not make complex cells. There are no transitional forms. Belief in these things is not science, but rather faith.
When truth refutes belief, should we not adjust our belief? Shouldn’t truth have a higher importance in our lives than belief? The fact that Darwinists still fervently cling to antiquated beliefs — resorting to actions ranging from rationalizing and quibbling to outright and intentional fraud — doesn’t that demonstrate that Darwinism is simply a fundamentalist religion and not a scientific principle? Science, after all, has some integrity.
Darwinism, lacking a real foundation, relies on false “artist impressions,” fictitiously taxidermied dead things, and and literature that constantly begs the question spinning assumption as fact. They have, after all, no foundation of truth upon which to stand.
Darwinism has a long history of placing less than factual “interpretive art” that does not reflect reality in textbooks dating back a few centuries, now. It is a fairly well known fact, since Dr. J. Wells published his book Icons of Evolution which was later made into a film, and textbooks had to adjust in the wake of an informed public. Even so, the fraud and the evolutionist indoctrination continues to this day.
Now, why do you suppose the feet of an australopithecine is shown to be a human foot? What do you suppose that means?
In these artist impressions of Lucy found in modern textbooks, she walks upright, has very human looking features, and has human feet.
Naturally, this is starkly inconsistent with the facts.
Lucy’s foot would have looked much more apelike than human.
It’s almost as if there is an agenda at work, here.
I think we must come to the inescapable conclusion that Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks to support their fallacious theories.
But what about museums?
Museums exist to portray history, facts, items of interest and so on in an accurate way. We rely on museums to recreate historical moments with accuracy and an exactness that puts us right in that moment. With those high ideals in mind, one would expect to find depictions of Lucy hanging out in a tree, perhaps munching on some fruit, or tending her young who is clinging to her back, much like a modern chimp.
Sadly, this is not the case.
Since we now know, for a certainty, that Lucy nor any other Australopithecus africanus walked upright, why do you suppose not one of these museums has changed their display?
Since we now know that Australopithecus africanus had no part in human ancestry, why do you think the displays headline things such as “The Hall of Origins!” and “The Human Story Begins!”
Why don’t they say, “Here’s a fictitious depiction of an extinct monkey — who want’s to buy a dead stuffed frog playing a piano?”
I think we must come to the inescapable conclusion that Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in museums to support their fallacious theories, as well.
The obvious question to ask at this point is — Why? Why is SO MUCH fraudulent activity required to prop up this theory?
I am going to leave it there for this week and leave you with these thoughts: Jesus Christ believed in the six days of creation. Jesus Christ believed in the biblical Adam and Eve as described in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. And Jesus Christ believed in Noah’s global flood.
John 5:46-47 reads: “If you had belief in Moses you would have belief in me; for his writings are about me. If you have no belief in his writings, how will you have belief in my words?” See Genesis 1:1-31 and Exodus 20:9-11.
Mark 10:6 reads: “But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.”
Matthew 19:4-5 reads: “And he said in answer, Have you not seen in the Writings, that he who made them at the first made them male and female, and said, For this cause will a man go away from his father and mother, and be joined to his wife; and the two will become one flesh?”
Matthew 24:37 reads: “But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
As Christians, we must put it into our hearts that the Word of God is true. If anyone should assail that truth, then they are simply in error. God’s Holy Word is without error.
I will conclude this series next week.
God Bless you and yours.