Creation: Darwinian Evolutionary Frauds Pt. XVI


A Sunday guest post by my brilliant husband, Gregg.

Every Sunday, my clever husband offers me a “day of rest” by writing posts on the subject of his primary ministry. This is a topic that is gaining more and more attention in our modern culture. The topic, Creationism vs. Darwinism, is a subject that has broad reaching scientific, social, and metaphysical implications.  For believers and non-believers alike, the primary purpose is to present scientific, historical, logical, and/or sociological data in an empirical fashion, as much as possible written in layman’s terms, and in a format suitable for supplementing any homeschool curriculum whether you choose to believe the Biblical account — or secular guesses — about the origins of human life on earth.

Case Study

Creation: Lucy bones -- 40% of an extinct chimp
Lucy -- 40% of the skeletal remains of a long extinct knuckle-walking monkey

For this case study, I will use the case of “Lucy” and if you need background on Lucy, please read the introductory post from last Sunday.

This is the second of three final posts which will conclude this series on Darwinian Evolutionary Frauds.  In the final three weeks, I will focus on these three claims:

  1. Darwinists ignore scientific evidence that refutes their theories.
  2. Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.
  3. Darwinists practice censorship to avoid debate that would reveal their theories to be baseless and fallacious

Point 2

FACT 1:  Accurate renditions of actual finds and scientific facts do not reflect Darwinian interpretations.

FACT 2:  Misleading renditions in museums and school textbooks amount to indoctrination, not valid information.

CONCLUSION: Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks and museums to support their fallacious theories over actual evidence.

Supporting Detail:  Darwinian evolution is taught as fact, not theory, in nearly ever scholarly venue.  Charts, diagrams, artist impressions, statues, and the like are all carefully “spun” to reflect Darwinist beliefs, not facts.

When facts are presented without spin, critical thinking will lead reasonable human beings to their own conclusions which often differ from Darwinian bias and more accurately reflect truth.

The fact is, there is no foundational truth to Darwinism.  Nothing cannot make something.  Gas cannot condense in a vacuum.  Lighter elements cannot “evolve” in situ into heavier elements.  The earth is not billions of years old.  Dirt and rocks do not make complex cells.  There are no transitional forms.  Belief in these things is not science, but rather faith.

When truth refutes belief, should we not adjust our belief?  Shouldn’t truth have a higher importance in our lives than belief?  The fact that Darwinists still fervently cling to antiquated beliefs — resorting to actions ranging from rationalizing and quibbling to outright and intentional fraud — doesn’t that demonstrate that Darwinism is simply a  fundamentalist religion and not a scientific principle?  Science, after all, has some integrity.

Darwinism, lacking a real foundation, relies on false “artist impressions,” fictitiously taxidermied dead things, and and literature that constantly begs the question spinning assumption as fact. They have, after all, no foundation of truth upon which to stand.


Darwinism has a long history of placing less than factual “interpretive art” that does not reflect reality in textbooks dating back a few centuries, now.   It is a fairly well known fact, since Dr. J. Wells published his book Icons of Evolution which was later made into a film, and textbooks had to adjust in the wake of an informed public.  Even so, the fraud and the evolutionist indoctrination continues to this day.

Drug resistant bacteria in textbooks
Antibiotic resistance is given as “direct evidence for evolution” according to the above illustration that appears in the Glencoe Biology textbook. (From Glencoe Biology, page 399) This is not science.

Creation: Hyracotherium to the modern Horse
Since 1879, there have been books and museum exhibits showing this "horse series". The straight line of evolution of the horse from Hyracotherium to the modern Horse is taught by almost all evolutionists.

Creation: Homology in Textbooks
The above illustration from the Prentice Hall Biology: Exploring Life textbook uses oversimplified claims about the bone structures of various animals and man to “prove” a common ancestor. (From Prentice Hall Biology: Exploring Life, page 301) This is not science.

Creation: Modern Textbook British Peppered Moth 1
Modern Textbook British Peppered Moth has nothing to do with macro-evolution whatsoever.

Haeckel taught as fact in a textbook in 2001

Creation: Textbook Diagram of 4-Winged Fruitfly
Textbook Diagram of an intelligently designed 4-Winged Fruitfly allegedly proves evolution by man-made mutation. The mutant fly can neither fly nor reproduce successfully.

Prentice Hall Biology Textbook puts a modern spin on Haekel's embryos
Prentice Hall Biology: Exploring Life Textbook puts a modern spin on Haekel's embryos including "gill slits" and "yolk sac" and "tail". This is not science. (From Prentice Hall Biology: Exploring Life, page 303.)

Creation: Ella Thea Smith Exploring Biology Textbook
Ella Thea Smith Textbook 1938 Exploring Biology demonstrates the "lesser" and the more evolved "favoured" races

Creation: Laetoli Footprints Textbook
Modern textbook image of Lucy and her family creating the Laetoli Footprints. Lucy and family did not walk upright and did not have human feet.

Creation: Lucy -- Textbook foot long evolutionary fraud
Drawing of Lucy's VERY human feet from Life: The Science of Biology, Purves, Orians, and Heller, 1992, p. 604.
Creation: Lucy's Foot bones and foot
Au. africanus foot bones

Now, why do you suppose the feet of an australopithecine is shown to be a human foot? What do you suppose that means?

In these artist impressions of Lucy found in modern textbooks, she walks upright, has very human looking features, and has human feet.

Naturally, this is starkly inconsistent with the facts.

Creation: Human foot and ape foot
Human v ape foot

Lucy’s foot would have looked much more apelike than human.

It’s almost as if there is an agenda at work, here.

I think we must come to the inescapable conclusion that Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in textbooks to support their fallacious theories.

But what about museums?


Museums exist to portray history, facts, items of interest and so on in an accurate way.  We rely on museums to recreate historical moments with accuracy and an exactness that puts us right in that moment.  With those high ideals in mind, one would expect to find depictions of Lucy hanging out in a tree, perhaps munching on some fruit, or tending her young who is clinging to her back, much like a modern chimp.

Sadly, this is not the case.

Creation: Lucy -- an upright tale of evolutionary fraud
Lucy as depicted by the Saint Louis Museum. Neither apelike eyes nor feet were used.
Creation: Lucy -- a foot long evolutionary fraud
Close up of the feet used in Saint Louis. Perhaps Missouri should change their motto to the "Show me a fraud" state.
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--American Museum of Natural History
American Museum of Natural History
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--American Museum of Natural History
Let's get real. No one wants to see that.
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Vancouver, British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Attributed to San Francisco MNH
Attributed to San Francisco MNH
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Commissioned for the Lucy 6 City US Roadshow
Commissioned for the Lucy 6 City US Roadshow
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Michigan State University
Michigan State University used artificial human eyes as well as feet for this depiction
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Ethiopia's Grand Opening of "Wonderful Thing"
Ethiopia's Grand Opening of "Wonderful Thing"
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio
Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Cleveland, Ohio reconstructed the skeleton to walk upright. Note the human hip and feet architecture
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Chicago Field Museum, Chicago, Illisnois
Chicago Field Museum, Chicago, Illisnois--The Human Story Begins!
Creation: Lucy in the Museum--Senckenberg Natural History Museum Frankfurt- Germany
Senckenberg Natural History Museum. Frankfurt, Germany

Since we now know, for a certainty, that Lucy nor any other Australopithecus africanus walked upright, why do you suppose not one of these museums has changed their display?

Since we now know that Australopithecus africanus had no part in human ancestry, why do you think the displays headline things such as “The Hall of Origins!” and “The Human Story Begins!”

Why don’t they say, “Here’s a fictitious depiction of an extinct monkey — who want’s to buy a dead stuffed frog playing a piano?”

I think we must come to the inescapable conclusion that Darwinists create misleading pictures and icons in museums to support their fallacious theories, as well.

The Truth

The obvious question to ask at this point is — Why?  Why is SO MUCH fraudulent activity required to prop up this theory?

I am going to leave it there for this week and leave you with these thoughts:  Jesus Christ believed in the six days of creation. Jesus Christ believed in the biblical Adam and Eve as described in Genesis chapters 1 and 2. And Jesus Christ believed in Noah’s global flood.

John 5:46-47 reads:   “If you had belief in Moses you would have belief in me; for his writings are about me. If you have no belief in his writings, how will you have belief in my words?”  See Genesis 1:1-31 and Exodus 20:9-11.

Mark 10:6 reads: “But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.”
Matthew 19:4-5 reads: “And he said in answer, Have you not seen in the Writings, that he who made them at the first made them male and female, and said, For this cause will a man go away from his father and mother, and be joined to his wife; and the two will become one flesh?”

Matthew 24:37 reads:  “But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”

As Christians, we must put it into our hearts that the Word of God is true.   If anyone should assail that truth, then they are simply in error.  God’s Holy Word is without error.

I will conclude this series next week.

God Bless you and yours.


Additional Posts dealing with Creation and Darwinism

Related Posts with ThumbnailsPin It
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Copyright © 2009 - 2024 Hallee the Homemaker All Rights Reserved.