The good folks over at Creation Ministries have developed and launched a new campaign involving 15 questions to ask “evolutionists.”
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creationism, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionism, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Thought, World view
Darwinists must somehow explain the introduction of completely new genetic instructions (information) for feathers, life preserving secretions, highly specific and specifically complex symbiotic relationships, instinctual migration patterns, and other wonders that never existed in more ‘simple’ forms of life.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Developmental biology, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Fallacy, Gary Parker, Gene duplication, genetic engineering, Genetics, Homeobox, Hox gene, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, John Rennie, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Scientific American, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The truth is that we were all created in God’s image. We did not come about as a result of mathematically impossible chance and accident. Mutation is the current placeholder in the current secular humanist world view until a better naturalistic, materialistic explanation can be hypothesized. For now, it is the best they have, and it is extremely weak.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
The logical claim is that less evolved “lower” life forms become more evolved “higher” life forms by means of the mechanisms of Neo-Darwinism — namely: mutation and natural selection.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
In the final analysis, mutations don’t help Darwinian theory at all. There are three major limiting factors that preclude scientific extrapolation from mutational change to evolutionary change on a Darwinian scale.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Just as in the days before Darwin, thousands of scientists in recent times, and hundreds of thousands of laymen, have concluded that the Biblical framework is the more logical inference based on scientific evidence and observations.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Gary Parker, genetic engineering, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Posted by Gregg on May 1, 2011 in
Blog Stuff “It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet or on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.”
Tags: Abiogenesis, Arthur Schopenhauer, Biology, Book of Genesis, C. Murray Eden, Chance, Charles Darwin, Charles Thaxton, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, David J. Rodabough, Emilé Borel, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Fred Hoyle, Frederick Hoyle, Gregg, Harold Morowitz, Hubert Yockey, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Paradigm, Paradigm Shift, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, Synthesis, Walter L. Bradley, Werner Gitt, William Dembski, World view
I observe just how pervasive Darwinism has become in the Christian culture. So many Christian blogs host MEMES without even knowing the origin of the word or understanding the concept MEMEs represent, a concept that advocates materialism in opposition to the Biblical God.
Pin It
Tags: Book of Genesis, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwin on Trial, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Neo-Darwinism, Phillip E. Johnson, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Pseudoscience, Religion, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
One may think that a worldview can be intellectually set aside so that objective thought, analysis, and experimentation can occur, thus yielding valid, cogent, sound conclusions via the scientific process. Sadly, this is not the case. Darwinism corrupts the scientific process and inhibits logical thought.
Pin It
Tags: Book of Genesis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Methodological Naturalism, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Religion, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
With hundreds of millions of years for constant mutations to build up and natural selection to occur, even the most ardent Darwinists should reasonably expect tremendous differences in the organism’s appearance by now.
Pin It
Tags: Book of Genesis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lazarus Taxa, Life from non-life, Living Fossils, Methodological Naturalism, Mitochondrial Eve, Mutation, Natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Religion, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
