Posted by Gregg on Sep 5, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling “Skull fragment may not be human”, announced the Knoxville News-Sentinel. The Daily Telegraph, an Australian newspaper, carried the story of the latest bone hoax with the much more humorous (pardon the pun) headline: “ASS TAKEN FOR MAN.”
Pin It
Tags: Alan Walker, anthropologist, Anthropology, Archaeology, Cenozoic, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Ernst Haeckel, Human Interest, Ian Anderson, José Gibert, Methodological Naturalism, New Scientist, Noel Boaz, Orce, Paleontology, Paul Palmqvist, Piltdown Man, Science, scientist, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Solly Zuckerman, Spain, The Daily Telegraph, the Knoxville News, University of California-Berkeley
Logic dictates that if Peking Man were an intermediate sub-human species, one of man’s evolutionary ancestors, that lived for even a few hundred generations, there should be abundant fossil remains available today.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Archaeology, Beijing, Charles Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Duane T. Gish, Ernst Mayr, Franz Weidenreich, Java Man, Methodological Naturalism, Peking Man, Piltdown Man, Pleistocene, Raymond Dart, Rockefeller Foundation, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Taung North West
Citing Neanderthal as a transitional form between ape and man? The fact is that so called “Neanderthals” were 100% human beings, as human as you or I, who happened to have various perfectly explainable health conditions. Painting them as half-man/half-apes, or a “separately evolved” race of hominids is simply unsubstantiated, misleading, and fraudulent.
Pin It
Tags: Anatomically modern humans, Archaeology, Caveman, Charles Darwin, Cro-Magnon, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Human evolution, Jack Cuozzo, Joachim Neander, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Neandertal, Neanderthal, Paleolithic, Pleistocene, Religion/Belief, Rudolph Virchow, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Thomas H. Huxley
Far from being indisputable, both the validity and the relevance of Java Man remains in serious and continuous dispute and, like Nebraska man, shares a heritage rich in fraud.
Pin It
Tags: Africa, Anthropology, Archaeology, Biology, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Ernst Haeckel, Eugène Dubois, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Homo erectus, Human Interest, Java, Java Man, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Nebraska, Paleoanthropology, Peking Man, Piltdown Man, Pithecometra principle, Secular Humanism, Skull, Social Darwinism, Trinil
If Darwinists were so obviously right, why all the Pious Fraud? Why ANY fraud at all? Why not let facts lead to unavoidable conclusions? Why add lies, misdirection, obfuscation, mendacity, fraud, and fabrication to the argument? Why is that necessary? What is the meaning of that? What do you suppose the intent, is?
Pin It
Tags: America, Archaeology, Caveman, Charles Darwin, Clarence Darrow, Creationism, Cro-Magnon, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dayton, Elliot Smith, Evolution, Extinction, Grafton Elliot Smith, Henry F. Osborn, Jack Cuozzo, Joachim Neander, Kabwe skull, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Neanderthal, Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Rudolph Virchow, Scopes Trial, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Tennessee, Thomas H. Huxley, William Jennings Bryan
Today, I will conclude the series on the age of planet earth documenting evidence from living things and demonstrating some mathematical evidences.
Pin It
Tags: A.E.J. Engel, Age of the Earth, Archaeology, B.C., Biology, Botany, Bristlecone pine, British Columbia, California Institute of Technology, Carl Sagan, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Cupressaceae, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dendrochronology, Emilé Borel, Environment, Evolution, Forestry, Geochronology, Methodological Naturalism, Methuselah, Natural history of California, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Sequoia, Sierra Nevada Mountains, Tree, William Demski
Today, I will document logical evidence for a young earth based on a series of logical questions. The premise of these questions is going to be based on facts, not assumptions. I realize that if you are a Darwinist then logic is meaningless to you and facts are irrelevant. Therefore, this post is written more for those who are capable of logical thought and accepting facts, and for that I apologize.
Pin It
Tags: Age of the Earth, Archaeology, Australia, Botany, Bristlecone pine, Charles Darwin, China, Creation myth, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Damascus, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dendrochronology, Environment, Evolution, Flat Earth, Forestry, Geochronology, Great Barrier Reef, Methodological Naturalism, Methuselah, Nature, Oldest City, Pseudoscience, Religion/Belief, Sahara desert, Secular Humanism, Tree
