Posted by Gregg on Aug 14, 2011 in
Blog Stuff The truth is that Darwinism is a WORLD VIEW with philosophical assumptions that any other religious world view relies upon. In the fanatical extremes — Dennet, Dawkins, etc. — it is clearly a dogmatic and fundamentalist religion and rather exclusive in nature.
Tags: Criticism of religion, fundamentalism, Philosophy of religion, Religion, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Richard Dawkins
I suppose it would be easier for my detractors if I were to passively consent to endlessly repeat myself, isolating my side of the main argument only to very finite details of the Darwinist religion here-and-there, those minuscule items of data with which my opponents have more than a passing familiarity. Then, those tiny little shreds of insignificant points could be held up as straw men amidst the multitude of monolithic refutations I can present, have presented, and will continue to present. Those little nothing straw men could then be ceremonially burned in effigy for the satisfaction of the lemmings, and the spiritually immature Darwinist detractor could then leave the field feeling victorious and even, dare I say, a bit self-righteous.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Chemical Evolution, Cosmic evolution, Creation, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Ethologists, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Life from non-life, Macro-evolution, Methodological Naturalism, Micro-evolution, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Physical law, Punctuated equilibrium, Religion/Belief, Richard Dawkins, Science, Scientific Law, Scientific method, Scientific theory, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Stellar evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, Supernatural, Thermodynamics, World view
In today’s post, I will examine the modern Darwinist beliefs and begin to step all the way back to the first second in the life of the entire universe.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biology, Carl Sagan, Charles Darwin, Chemical Evolution, Cosmic evolution, Craig T. Palmer, Creation, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, David M. Buss, Dr. John Heller, Epistemology, Ethologists, Eugenics, Evolution, Evolutionary Psychology, Fallacy, Final Solution, Forced Sterilizations, Genocide, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish Problem, Jr., Life from non-life, Macro-evolution, Martin Luther King, Methodological Naturalism, Micro-evolution, Nazi Genocide, Neil Malamuth, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Physical law, Randy Thornhill, Religion/Belief, Richard Dawkins, Science, Scientific Law, Scientific method, Scientific theory, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Stellar evolution, Supernatural, Tasmanian Genocide, Thermodynamics, Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, World view
Posted by Gregg on May 23, 2010 in
apologetics,
Creation,
homeschooling If you leave a Microsoft Exchange Server alone long enough it will naturally turn into an iPhone. All you need is the magic ingredient of millions of years and a really cool, yet utterly random program that will replicate itself.
Pin It
Tags: Academy of Information Science, Computing, Creation science, Creationism, Digital audio, Evolution, Information Technology, IPhone, Microsoft Corporation, Richard Dawkins, scientist, Stephen Hawking, Young Earth creationism
Darwinists scrambled for “engines” that would “drive” Darwinian evolution. This is admittedly an attempt to skew the odds to make their idiotic theory somewhat plausible by compensating for finite time and matter in the universe.
Even supposing the universe is 15 billion years old, that is a finite amount of seconds in which an infinite amount of changes must occur for Darwinism to be true. Even supposing the earth is 4 billion or so years old, a single cell has to assemble itself from dirt and rocks and such by an undirected, unguided, random process –and for that simple single cell to appear, a nearly infinite number of random occurrences must take place in order, without error. The best estimates put it at a greater than 1 in 10 to the 100,000,000,000th power chance.
Pin It
Tags: Charles Darwin, chemicals, Christian, Christian Faith, Creation, Creationism, Darwin, Darwinism, Darwinists, Evolution, Homeschool, Infinite monkey theorem, Lamarckism, Malaria, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Natural selection, Objections to evolution, Online mutant dating service, Punctuated equilibrium, Richard Dawkins, Secular Humanism, Stephen Jay Gould, William Shakespeare
