Posted by Hallee on Dec 29, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling,
Parenting Fallacies from relevance ignore the point at hand and attempt to derail the argument by bringing irrelevancies into the arena of the debate. In this post, I will discuss the Ad Hominem abusive and the Ad Hominem circumstantial.
Pin It
Tags: Ad hominem, Argument, Argument from fallacy, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Genetic fallacies, Homeschool, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Modal logic, Non-classical logic, Objections to evolution, Philosophical logic, Philosophy, Poisoning the well, Propositional logic, Reasoning, Slippery slope, Speaker, Survival tool, Thought
Before I step into the primordial soup that is Chemical Evolution, which slips nicely down the logical slope into the quagmire of Abiogenesis, I must preface those future posts with some foundational data. This data is important for context. The foundational data we must examine has to do with the fallacy of Darwinist reification and the age of the earth. In this post, I will focus on reification.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Age of the Earth, Charles Darwin, Chemical Evolution, Christian, Christian Faith, Creation, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Evolution, Homeschool, Methodological Naturalism, Modal logic, Mother Earth, Non-classical logic, Panspermia, Philosophical logic, Reification, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism
