Creation: Question Evolution Campaign — 9 of 15

Posted by Gregg on Mar 4, 2012 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing?

Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould, Supernatural, World view

Creation: The Modern View Stepping Backward II

Posted by Gregg on Jan 30, 2011 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

I suppose it would be easier for my detractors if I were to passively consent to endlessly repeat myself, isolating my side of the main argument only to very finite details of the Darwinist religion here-and-there, those minuscule items of data with which my opponents have more than a passing familiarity. Then, those tiny little shreds of insignificant points could be held up as straw men amidst the multitude of monolithic refutations I can present, have presented, and will continue to present. Those little nothing straw men could then be ceremonially burned in effigy for the satisfaction of the lemmings, and the spiritually immature Darwinist detractor could then leave the field feeling victorious and even, dare I say, a bit self-righteous.

Pin It

Tags: Abiogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Chemical Evolution, Cosmic evolution, Creation, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Ethologists, Evolution, Fallacy, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Life from non-life, Macro-evolution, Methodological Naturalism, Micro-evolution, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Physical law, Punctuated equilibrium, Religion/Belief, Richard Dawkins, Science, Scientific Law, Scientific method, Scientific theory, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Spontaneous generation, Stellar evolution, Stephen Jay Gould, Supernatural, Thermodynamics, World view

Creation: Abiogenesis Part II

Posted by Gregg on Mar 7, 2010 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

Abiogenesis is the notion that if you assemble all of the base components you need in order for life to exist under the ideal conditions, that life will simply happen. The context of this so called theory is that all of the base components needed in order for life to exist, along with all of the ideal conditions, had to have come together randomly and exclusively by way of undirected processes.

Pin It

Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould

Creation: Abiogenesis Part I

Posted by Gregg on Feb 28, 2010 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

The next series of Sunday posts will focus on the Darwinian concept of “Abiogenesis” which is the authoritatively scientific sounding word that Darwinists invented to describe how life sprung into existence from non-living matter.

Pin It

Creation: All Things New Again

Posted by Gregg on Dec 27, 2009 in apologetics, Creation, homeschooling

Because of the Hubble Constant, their math doesn’t even work out anymore. There are stars that are moving far too fast; stars that are far too distant, stars that are far too bright; etc., ad nauseam. Informed scientists know this. Many have abandoned the accepted theories and are in dedicated pursuit of the truth. Many others refuse to do so because of the metaphysical implications alternative theories present. The latter group has the loudest voice.

Pin It

Tags: Age of the Earth, Architect, Charles Darwin, Christmas, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Designer, Evolution, Methodological Naturalism, New Year's Day, Objections to evolution, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Stephen Jay Gould, The Universe

Creation: Darwinian Engines of Evolution

Posted by Gregg on Oct 18, 2009 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

Darwinists scrambled for “engines” that would “drive” Darwinian evolution. This is admittedly an attempt to skew the odds to make their idiotic theory somewhat plausible by compensating for finite time and matter in the universe.

Even supposing the universe is 15 billion years old, that is a finite amount of seconds in which an infinite amount of changes must occur for Darwinism to be true. Even supposing the earth is 4 billion or so years old, a single cell has to assemble itself from dirt and rocks and such by an undirected, unguided, random process –and for that simple single cell to appear, a nearly infinite number of random occurrences must take place in order, without error. The best estimates put it at a greater than 1 in 10 to the 100,000,000,000th power chance.