Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs).
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Asexual reproduction, Belief, Biochemistry, Biology, Book of Genesis, Cell, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, energy, Epistemology, Evolution, Fallacy, Genetic code, Genetics, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Lamarckism, lifeless chemicals, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Origin of life, Parthenogenesis, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Reproduction, RNA world hypothesis, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Selection, Sexual selection, sexuality, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
