Creation: Darwinian Evolutionary Frauds Pt. IV

Posted by Gregg on Jul 11, 2010 in apologetics, Christian Faith, Creation, homeschooling

If Darwinists were so obviously right, why all the Pious Fraud? Why ANY fraud at all? Why not let facts lead to unavoidable conclusions? Why add lies, misdirection, obfuscation, mendacity, fraud, and fabrication to the argument? Why is that necessary? What is the meaning of that? What do you suppose the intent, is?

Pin It

Tags: America, Archaeology, Caveman, Charles Darwin, Clarence Darrow, Creationism, Cro-Magnon, Darwinism, Darwinist, Dayton, Elliot Smith, Evolution, Extinction, Grafton Elliot Smith, Henry F. Osborn, Jack Cuozzo, Joachim Neander, Kabwe skull, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Neanderthal, Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Rudolph Virchow, Scopes Trial, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Tennessee, Thomas H. Huxley, William Jennings Bryan

Hallee the Homemaker

HOMEMAKER

Find Me on My Author Blog

Meta

Categories