Posted by Hallee on Dec 11, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling The main division between forms of reasoning is between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. Formal logic has been described as ‘the science of deduction’ while inductive reasoning is generally carried out within the field of informal logic. Both are vital and important tools in the disciplined work of thinking.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Deductive reasoning, Epistemology, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Inductive reasoning, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Problem solving, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
Posted by Hallee on Nov 28, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling The Laws of Thought
1. The Law of Identity
2. The Law of Noncontradiction
3. The Law of Excluded Middle (aka. Excluded Third)
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Boolean algebra, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Law of excluded middle, Law of thought, Law/Crime, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical disjunction, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Principle of contradiction, Propositional logic, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Rules of inference, Slippery slope, Thought
Posted by Hallee on Nov 19, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling These seven critical reading strategies can be learned readily and then applied not only to reading selections in a Literature class, but also to your other college reading. Mastering these strategies will help you handle difficult material with confidence.
Pin It
Tags: Analyzing, Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Books, conclusion, Conflation, Critical pedagogy, Critical reading, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Dialectic, Education, Educational psychology, Epistemology, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Pedagogy, Philosophical logic, Philosophy, Reading comprehension, Reasoning, Slippery slope, Speed reading, Synthesizing, Theories of truth, Thought, Truth
Posted by Hallee on Nov 12, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling We believe that Critical Thinking is a mental toolbox containing a number of thinking tools. We intend to teach our children how to use all those tools. One of those tools is the ability to discriminate; specifically meaning the ability to discriminate between a fact, an opinion, an assumption, or an inference.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Cognition, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Discriminating, Education, Epistemology, Fact, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, important tool, Inference, Information, Knowledge, Laws of thought, Learning, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Problem solving, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
Posted by Hallee on Nov 4, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling A great deal of the content of this website is dedicated to information pertaining to physical and spiritual needs. Hopefully, that provides some insight into how we, as parents, meet the needs of our children in those two very often overlooked areas. Keeping things in balance, we wanted to offer some insight into the most overlooked area, that being how we choose to meet their intellectual needs, as well.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Cognition, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Culture, Deduction, Discriminating, Education, Education reform, Educational psychology, Fallacies, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, John R. Chambers, Laws of thought, Learning, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Michael Scriven, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Richard Paul, Robert H. Ennis, Skill, Slippery slope, Socratic questioning, Synthesizing, Thinking tools, Thought, University of Illinois
