How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist?
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Amino acid, Biology, Christian theology, Chromosome, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Cytogenetics, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, DNA, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Gene, Genetics, Health/Medical/Pharmaceuticals, hemophilia, human diseases, Indoctrination, Jerry Coyne, Logic, Materialism, Methodological materialism, Methodological Naturalism, microbiologist, Mitochondrial Eve, Mitochondrial genetics, Modal logic, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy of science, Ploidy, Probability, Protein, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Somatic cell, World view
Darwinists must somehow explain the introduction of completely new genetic instructions (information) for feathers, life preserving secretions, highly specific and specifically complex symbiotic relationships, instinctual migration patterns, and other wonders that never existed in more ‘simple’ forms of life.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Belief, Biology, Book of Genesis, Chance, Charles Darwin, Christian theology, Creation, Creation according to Genesis, Creator deity, Critical Thinking, Darwinian Evolutionary Model, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Developmental biology, Epistemology, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Fallacy, Gary Parker, Gene duplication, genetic engineering, Genetics, Homeobox, Hox gene, Indoctrination, Intelligent design, Jewish views on evolution, John Rennie, Lamarckism, Materialism, Methodological Naturalism, Modern evolutionary synthesis, Mutation, Natural selection, Nature, Neo-Darwinism, Omniscience, Philosophical Bias, Philosophy, Philosophy of science, Probability, Pseudoscience, Religion, Religion/Belief, Science, Scientific American, Secular Humanism, Secularism, Spontaneous generation, Supernatural, World view
Far from being indisputable, both the validity and the relevance of Java Man remains in serious and continuous dispute and, like Nebraska man, shares a heritage rich in fraud.
Pin It
Tags: Africa, Anthropology, Archaeology, Biology, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Ernst Haeckel, Eugène Dubois, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Homo erectus, Human Interest, Java, Java Man, Methodological Naturalism, Neander Valley, Nebraska, Paleoanthropology, Peking Man, Piltdown Man, Pithecometra principle, Secular Humanism, Skull, Social Darwinism, Trinil
This is the inaugural post of a new Creation series. The next series of posts will review some of the more blatant frauds committed by Darwinists in the name of their religion, that being secular humanism.
Pin It
Tags: biogenetic law, Biology, Charles Darwin, Crimes, Darwin-Wallace Medal, Darwinism, Deception, Embryo drawing, Ernst Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August Haeckel, Ethics, Every Sunday, Evolutionary biology, Fraud, Lie, Linnean Society of London, Methodological Naturalism, Nature, On the Origin of Species, Recapitulation theory, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, von Haeckel
Posted by Gregg on Mar 14, 2010 in
Blog Stuff I explained the Darwinist belief in spontaneous generation packaged for textbooks as abiogenesis, and recently re-packaged and re-branded and re-labeled to be called biopoiesis, until a new and improved authoritatively scientific sounding word replaces that one. It means, in a nutshell, that Darwinists preach about life coming from non-life.
Tags: Abiogenesis, Acid, Amino acid, Biology, Charles Darwin, chemical reaction, chemical reactions, chemical transformations, Chemistry, Condensation, electricity, energy, Every Sunday, Evolutionary biology, Frankenstein, Mary Shelly, Miller–Urey experiment, Molecular biology, Nature, Nutrition, Origin of life, Protein, separate chemicals
Abiogenesis is the notion that if you assemble all of the base components you need in order for life to exist under the ideal conditions, that life will simply happen. The context of this so called theory is that all of the base components needed in order for life to exist, along with all of the ideal conditions, had to have come together randomly and exclusively by way of undirected processes.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould
The next series of Sunday posts will focus on the Darwinian concept of “Abiogenesis” which is the authoritatively scientific sounding word that Darwinists invented to describe how life sprung into existence from non-living matter.
Pin It
Tags: Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, Biology, Charles Darwin, Creation-evolution controversy, Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Isaac Asimov, Louis Pastuer, Methodological Naturalism, Microbiology, Nature, Origin of life, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Secular Humanism, Spontaneous generation, Stephen Jay Gould
