FACT 1: There is NOTHING in observed science that disputes the Biblical account of creation.
FACT 2: There is NOTHING in observed science that supports Darwinism or Darwinian theories.
CONCLUSION: Darwinists ignore scientific evidence that refute their theories.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, Charles Darwin, Creation, Creationism, Darwinian Mythology, Darwinian Myths, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Donald C. Johanson, Donald Johanson, Epistemology, Human evolution, Hypothesis testing, Indoctrination, Jeremy Cherfas, Lucy, Methodological Naturalism, Owen Lovejoy, Paleoanthropology, Paleontology, Philosophy, Relativism, Religion and science, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Transitional fossil, World view
Lucy, one of the most recent of the Australopithecus finds, was unearthed by Donald C. Johanson at Hadar, Ethiopia in 1975. He dated it at 3 million years old.
Pin It
Tags: Anthropology, Australopithecus, Australopithecus afarensis, British Museum of Natural History, Charles Darwin, Creation, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Donald C. Johanson, Donald Johanson, Epistemology, Ethics, Human behavior, Human evolution, Indoctrination, Lucy, Mary Leakey, Methodological Naturalism, Owen Lovejoy, Paleoanthropology, Paleontology, Peter Andrews, Philosophy, Prehistoric Africa, Relativism, Religion/Belief, Richard Leakey, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Tim White, Transitional fossil, World view
Posted by Gregg on Nov 21, 2010 in
Blog Stuff What has been on my mind recently is the way in which the Christian worldview has been so severely compromised.
Tags: Charles Darwin, Conspiracy theories, Creation, Darwinism, Darwinist, Darwinists, Epistemology, Ethics, Every Sunday, Human behavior, Indoctrination, Methodological Naturalism, Philosophy, public school systems, Relativism, Religion/Belief, Science, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Theories of truth, Thought, Truth, World view
Posted by Hallee on Apr 8, 2010 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling In this post, I will discuss the Fallacy of the Weak Analogy, sometimes called the Fallacy of the Questionable Analogy and sometimes mistakenly called a False Analogy.
Pin It
Tags: Abstraction, Analogy, Analogy of Necessity, Apples and oranges, Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Designer, Epistemology, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, False analogy, Formal fallacy, Information, intelligent agent, Intelligent design, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Questionable Analogy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Science, Slippery slope, Survival tool, Teleological argument, Thought, Watchmaker analogy, Weak Analogy, William Paley
Posted by Hallee on Dec 11, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling The main division between forms of reasoning is between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. Formal logic has been described as ‘the science of deduction’ while inductive reasoning is generally carried out within the field of informal logic. Both are vital and important tools in the disciplined work of thinking.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Deductive reasoning, Epistemology, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Inductive reasoning, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Problem solving, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
Posted by Hallee on Nov 19, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling These seven critical reading strategies can be learned readily and then applied not only to reading selections in a Literature class, but also to your other college reading. Mastering these strategies will help you handle difficult material with confidence.
Pin It
Tags: Analyzing, Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Books, conclusion, Conflation, Critical pedagogy, Critical reading, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Dialectic, Education, Educational psychology, Epistemology, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Pedagogy, Philosophical logic, Philosophy, Reading comprehension, Reasoning, Slippery slope, Speed reading, Synthesizing, Theories of truth, Thought, Truth
Posted by Hallee on Nov 12, 2009 in
Critical Thinking,
homeschooling We believe that Critical Thinking is a mental toolbox containing a number of thinking tools. We intend to teach our children how to use all those tools. One of those tools is the ability to discriminate; specifically meaning the ability to discriminate between a fact, an opinion, an assumption, or an inference.
Pin It
Tags: Argument, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Cognition, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Discriminating, Education, Epistemology, Fact, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, important tool, Inference, Information, Knowledge, Laws of thought, Learning, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Problem solving, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Slippery slope, Thought
