Critical Thinking: Fallacies from Relevance XII
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Critical Thinking: Fallacies from Relevance XII”.
... other posts by Hallee
Tags: Argument, Argument from (Personal) Incredulity, Argument from ignorance, Argument from Incredulity, Argumentation theory, Arguments, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, conclusion, Conflation, Critical Thinking, Deduction, Fallacies of Darwinism, Fallacy, Formal fallacy, Information, Laws of thought, Loaded question, Logic, Logical fallacies, Objections to evolution, Philosophy, Reasoning, Religion/Belief, Rhetoric, Slippery slope, Survival tool, Thought
-
The Boston 3-Day
HOMEMAKER
Pronunciation:\ˈhōm-ˌmā-kər\
Function: noun
Date: 1876
Definition: home·mak·er - a woman who manages a home as wife and mother while her husband earns the household incomeFind me on Facebook
Recent Comments
- michelle on Homemade Powdered Dishwasher Detergent
- onajobi on Prayer Requests
- Roller Coaster on Military Spouse Appreciation Day Blog Hop
- Hallee on Surviving Separation: Dealing With It
- Allie on Military Spouse Appreciation Day Blog Hop
- Tina Sarber on Surviving Separation: Dealing With It
- Diaper Planner | Hallee The Homemaker on Cloth Diapers
Recent Posts
-
Gregg & Hallee

Categories
- Blog Stuff (169)
- Causes (41)
- Breast Cancer Awareness (20)
- March of Dimes (5)
- Mercy House Kenya (8)
- Christian Faith (360)
- apologetics (95)
- biblical manhood (35)
- Biblical womanhood (107)
- converstations (20)
- Creation (82)
- fellowship (16)
- holiness (39)
- hospitality (1)
- inspiration (36)
- Lies and Truth (10)
- missions (23)
- Prayer (56)
- Praying Wife (33)
- Stewardship (41)
- Budgeting (10)
- Virtues (7)
- Critical Thinking (26)
- Family (40)
- Gift Ideas (12)
- Giveaways (75)
- Hallee's Galley (576)
- Food Art (1)
- Gardening (40)
- kitchen & cooking tips (49)
- menus & menu planning (139)
- Natural Health (3)
- Preserving (22)
- Recipes (329)
- beverages (9)
- Breads (36)
- Breakfast (30)
- Desserts (78)
- diet & fasting (50)
- Daniel Fast (43)
- Leviticus (4)
- entrees (94)
- American Quisine (44)
- Italian (11)
- Mediterranean (14)
- Mexican (19)
- Oriental (3)
- Holiday fare (70)
- Salads (14)
- sauces & spreads (21)
- sides (47)
- Snacks (29)
- Soups (18)
- starters (12)
- Housekeeping (85)
- Life (229)
- Love (133)
- Dating (3)
- Holy matrimony (70)
- Kissing (1)
- Marriage (102)
- Romance (24)
- Sex (12)
- Surviving separation (18)
- Parenting (279)
- homeschooling (125)
- preschool activities (23)
- Raising boys (54)
- Raising girls (60)
- Raising teens (42)
- Writing (24)















There’s a lot in this post that I think misrepresents scientists.
(If I respond, I’ll probably put my comment on the abiogenesis post because it would fit there better.)
Please stop that. I do not misrepresent scientists or science. My sister is a scientist, just so you know.
I feel that I very accurately represent the beliefs of Darwinists whether they are scientists or hotel maids. “Scientist” is merely a vocation. Darwinism is a religion.
(I had written a longer comment earlier, but had deleted it by mistake and I’m not feeling like trying to rewrite it right now.)
That is always terribly frustrating. I’m sorry that happened!
thanks! I did rewrite part of it. The rest I’ll let go.